Products related to Disagreement:
-
Disagreement
This Element engages with the epistemic significance of disagreement, focusing on its skeptical implications.It examines various types of disagreement-motivated skepticism in ancient philosophy, ethics, philosophy of religion, and general epistemology.In each case, it favors suspension of judgment as the seemingly appropriate response to the realization of disagreement.One main line of argument pursued in the Element is that, since in real-life disputes we have limited or inaccurate information about both our own epistemic standing and the epistemic standing of our dissenters, personal information and self-trust can rarely function as symmetry breakers in favor of our own views.
Price: 17.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Disagreement
This Element engages with the epistemic significance of disagreement, focusing on its skeptical implications.It examines various types of disagreement-motivated skepticism in ancient philosophy, ethics, philosophy of religion, and general epistemology.In each case, it favors suspension of judgment as the seemingly appropriate response to the realization of disagreement.One main line of argument pursued in the Element is that, since in real-life disputes we have limited or inaccurate information about both our own epistemic standing and the epistemic standing of our dissenters, personal information and self-trust can rarely function as symmetry breakers in favor of our own views.
Price: 49.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Disagreement : Politics and Philosophy
“Is there any such thing as political philosophy?” So begins this provocative book by one of the foremost figures in Continental thought.Here, Jacques Rancière brings a new and highly useful set of terms to the vexed debate about political effectiveness and “the end of politics.”What precisely is at stake in the relationship between “philosophy” and the adjective “political”?In Disagreement, Rancière explores the apparent contradiction between these terms and reveals the uneasy meaning of their union in the phrase “political philosophy”—a juncture related to age-old attempts in philosophy to answer Plato’s devaluing of politics as a “democratic egalitarian” process. According to Rancière, the phrase also expresses the paradox of politics itself: the absence of a proper foundation.Politics, he argues, begins when the “demos” (the “excessive” or unrepresented part of society) seeks to disrupt the order of domination and distribution of goods “naturalized” by police and legal institutions.In addition, the notion of “equality” operates as a game of contestation that constantly substitutes litigation for political action and community.This game, Rancière maintains, operates by a primary logic of “misunderstanding.” In turn, political philosophy has always tried to substitute the “politics of truth” for the politics of appearances. Disagreement investigates the various transformations of this regime of “truth” and their effects on practical politics.Rancière then distinguishes what we mean by “democracy” from the practices of a consensual system in order to unravel the ramifications of the fashionable phrase “the end of politics.” His conclusions will be of interest to readers concerned with political questions from the broadest to the most specific and local.
Price: 25.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment
Carol A. Chapelle shows readers how to design validation research for tests of human capacities and performance.Any test that is used to make decisions about people or programs should have undergone extensive research to demonstrate that the scores are actually appropriate for their intended purpose.Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment is intended to help close the gap between theory and practice, by introducing, explaining, and demonstrating how test developers can formulate the overall design for their validation research from an argument-based perspective.
Price: 34.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What are typical topics of disagreement?
Typical topics of disagreement can vary widely depending on the individuals involved, but common areas of contention include politics, religion, money, parenting styles, and lifestyle choices. These topics often involve deeply held beliefs and values, making them more likely to lead to disagreements. Communication, respect, and compromise are key in navigating these disagreements and finding common ground.
-
Because of a disagreement about grammar.
Because of a disagreement about grammar, the two authors were unable to come to a consensus on how to structure their collaborative writing project. One author insisted on following a strict set of grammar rules, while the other preferred a more flexible and creative approach. As a result, they were unable to move forward with their project and had to part ways. This highlights the importance of clear communication and compromise when working with others on writing projects.
-
What is the disagreement with my psychotherapist?
It's important to have an open and honest conversation with your psychotherapist about the disagreement. It could be related to the treatment approach, goals, or the therapeutic relationship itself. It's important to communicate your concerns and listen to your therapist's perspective as well. If the disagreement persists, it may be helpful to seek a second opinion or consider finding a new therapist who is a better fit for your needs.
-
Why is there disagreement about energy consumption?
There is disagreement about energy consumption because it is a complex and multifaceted issue that involves various stakeholders with different perspectives and interests. Different industries, governments, and environmental groups may have conflicting priorities when it comes to energy consumption, leading to disagreements about the best approaches and policies. Additionally, there are differing opinions on the impact of energy consumption on the environment, economy, and society, further contributing to the disagreement. Finally, the rapid advancements in technology and the evolving global energy landscape also contribute to the ongoing debate about energy consumption.
Similar search terms for Disagreement:
-
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement.Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals.However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups.Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups.The chapters in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements.They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues.The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology; disagreement; and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics.
Price: 39.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment
The striking extent of religious disagreement suggests that religious conviction is very often the result of processes that do not reliably produce true beliefs.For this reason, many have argued that the only rational response to religious disagreement is to adopt a religious skepticism that eschews confident religious belief.Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment contests this skeptical conclusion, explaining how it could be rational to maintain confident belief even in the face of the epistemic worries posed by disagreement.John Pittard argues against the commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality that underlies the case for disagreement-motivated religious skepticism, while also critiquing approaches to disagreement that allow for the unproblematic privileging of one's first-person perspective.He emphasizes the importance of having rational insight into reasons that favor one's outlook; however, he challenges narrowly intellectualist accounts of insight, arguing that many of the rational insights crucial to assessing religious outlooks are not achievable through analytical reasoning, but only through relevant emotional experiences. In the second part of the book, Pittard considers the implications that accepting the impartiality requirement favored by "disagreement skeptics" has for religious commitment.He challenges the common assumption that a commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality would rule out confident religious belief.He further argues, however, that such an impartiality commitment would likely make it irrational to pursue one's favored form of religious life and might prevent one from rationally engaging in any religious or irreligious way of life whatsoever.This troubling conclusion gives reason to hope that the arguments against impartiality are correct and that one can justify conviction despite widespread disagreement.
Price: 19.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Mere Civility : Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration
A New Statesman Best Book of the YearA Church Times Book of the YearWe are facing a crisis of civility, a war of words polluting our public sphere.In liberal democracies committed to tolerating active, often heated disagreement, the loss of this virtue appears critical.Most modern appeals to civility follow arguments by Hobbes or Locke by proposing to suppress disagreement or exclude views we deem “uncivil” for the sake of social harmony.By comparison, mere civility—a grudging conformity to norms of respectful behavior—as defended by Rhode Island’s founder, Roger Williams, might seem minimal and unappealing.Yet Teresa Bejan argues that Williams’s outlook offers a promising path forward in confronting our own crisis, one that challenges our fundamental assumptions about what a tolerant—and civil—society should look like. “Penetrating and sophisticated.”—James Ryerson, New York Times Book Review“Would that more of us might learn to look into the past with such gravity and humility.We might end up with a more (or mere) civil society, yet.”—Los Angeles Review of Books“A deeply admirable book: original, persuasive, witty, and eloquent.”—Jacob T.Levy, Review of Politics“A terrific book—learned, vigorous, and challenging.”—Alison McQueen, Stanford University
Price: 21.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Why Are We Yelling? : The Art of Productive Disagreement
'This is a life-changing book. Read it three times and then give a copy to anyone you care about.It will make things better' – Seth Godin, author of This is Marketing'All you need is Buster Benson.His methods are instantly actionable, [and] his writing is funny and relatable' – Adam Grant, author of OriginalsWhy Are We Yelling is Buster Benson's essential guide to having more honest and constructive arguments. The way we argue is broken. Whether it’s about Brexit, the existence of ghosts, the best burger in the city or who’s allowed to sit in your favourite chair, we end up digging our heels in and yelling at one another or choosing to avoid heated topics entirely.There has to be a better way. Buster Benson, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur with two decades of experience facilitating hard conversations at some of the biggest tech companies in the world, recommends eight things to try in order to make disagreements more productive.By applying these eight new habits, we can flip frustrating, unproductive disagreements into ones that bear fruit and bring people closer together. In this book you'll master practical skills to make your disagreements more productive by:- Understanding four ways of disagreeing that are more valuable than simply ‘winning’ the argument- Identifying the kind of argument you’re having so you know how best to negotiate it- Articulating the best possible version of your opponent’s argument before attacking itWith this toolkit we can explore more possibilities and perspectives in the world, simply because we’ll no longer be afraid to wade into scary topics of conversation.
Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What are the topics of disagreement in your relationship?
In our relationship, the main topics of disagreement are usually related to communication styles, financial decisions, and division of household responsibilities. We sometimes have differing opinions on how to effectively communicate with each other, which can lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, we may have different priorities when it comes to managing finances and budgeting. Lastly, we occasionally struggle to find a balance in sharing household chores and responsibilities, which can cause tension at times.
-
How should I handle a disagreement with my teacher?
When handling a disagreement with your teacher, it's important to approach the situation calmly and respectfully. Start by expressing your concerns in a polite and constructive manner, focusing on the specific issue at hand. Listen to your teacher's perspective and try to find common ground or a compromise. If the disagreement persists, consider seeking advice from a school counselor or administrator to help mediate the situation. Remember to maintain a positive and professional attitude throughout the process.
-
How can I recognize hidden feelings despite a disagreement?
One way to recognize hidden feelings despite a disagreement is to pay attention to nonverbal cues such as body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice. These subtle signs can often reveal underlying emotions that someone may not be expressing openly. Additionally, actively listening to the other person's words and trying to empathize with their perspective can help uncover any hidden feelings they may have. It's also important to create a safe and open environment for honest communication, allowing the other person to feel comfortable sharing their true emotions.
-
What is the cause of the disagreement in naming?
Disagreements in naming can arise due to various reasons such as personal preferences, cultural differences, historical significance, or even political motivations. Different individuals or groups may have distinct perspectives on what a particular entity should be called based on their own beliefs, values, or associations. Additionally, language barriers or misunderstandings can also contribute to disagreements in naming. Ultimately, the root cause of naming disagreements often lies in the subjective nature of language and the diverse interpretations people have towards names and labels.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.